This deep dive covers Other Data Collection Methods: Pedestrian Counts, Land Use and Questionnaires within Human Geography Fieldwork for GCSE Geography. Revise Human Geography Fieldwork in Fieldwork for GCSE Geography with 13 exam-style questions and 20 flashcards. This topic shows up very often in GCSE exams, so students should be able to explain it clearly, not just recognise the term. It is section 4 of 14 in this topic. Use this deep dive to connect the idea to the wider topic before moving on to questions and flashcards.
🚶 Other Data Collection Methods: Pedestrian Counts, Land Use and Questionnaires
Pedestrian Count
A pedestrian count records how many people walk past a fixed point within a set time period — usually 5 minutes. It is a simple, reliable, and genuinely quantitative method (unlike the EQS, there is no judgement involved — you either count a person or you do not). Pedestrian counts test hypotheses about footfall, sphere of influence, and the relative busyness of different zones.
How to conduct it properly:
- Choose a fixed counting position at each site (e.g., stand at the kerb edge, facing the road).
- Count every person who passes in both directions within 5 minutes.
- Repeat 3 times at each site, then calculate the mean of the three counts.
- Conduct all sites at the same time of day — pedestrian flow varies enormously between morning rush hour, lunchtime, and mid-afternoon. If you count Site 1 at 9am and Site 6 at 12pm, the difference in counts may reflect time of day rather than location.
Limitations:
- Time-of-day variation: Even if all sites are surveyed at the same time, that time of day may not represent typical patterns. A 10am count on a Tuesday misses commuters and weekend shoppers.
- Weather effects: Rain significantly reduces pedestrian counts in all zones. If weather changed between surveying different sites, results are not directly comparable.
- Special events: A market, festival, or roadworks near one site will distort the count for that site.
- Repeat surveys: Counting on a single day gives a snapshot, not an average. Ideally, repeat the survey on different days of the week and average the results.
Land Use Survey
A land use survey records the use of every building along the transect — or in a sample area around each site. Buildings are categorised as: retail, office/commercial, residential, industrial/warehouse, vacant/derelict, leisure/hospitality, or other. The results are recorded on a base map and can be presented as a proportional bar chart for each zone, showing how the mix of land uses changes with distance from the CBD.
How to conduct it:
- Use a pre-printed categorisation sheet with a colour code for each land use type.
- Record the ground-floor use of every building in a 50m stretch around each site.
- Note whether ground floor and upper floors differ (e.g., a shop on the ground floor with flats above — this is mixed use, common in the CBD).
Key prediction from Burgess's model: Retail and commercial land use should be highest in the CBD (Zone 1) and decrease with distance. Residential land use should be lowest in the CBD and increase toward the outer suburbs.
Limitations:
- The ground floor does not always represent the building's primary use (e.g., a bank occupying the ground floor of a 12-storey office block).
- Categorisation can be ambiguous — is a nail salon retail or personal service?
- The survey captures a snapshot; land uses change over time (vacant units may have been recently occupied).
Questionnaire / Interview
A questionnaire gathers data about people's perceptions, attitudes, and experiences of an area. This produces qualitative data (open questions: "What do you like most about this area?") and/or quantitative data (closed questions with Likert scales: "Rate this area for cleanliness, where 1 = very dirty and 5 = very clean").
How to conduct it:
- Prepare your questionnaire in advance — do not ask questions on the spot.
- Use a mix of closed and open questions (typically 6–10 questions in total).
- Use random sampling: approach every 5th person who passes, regardless of who they are. This avoids cherry-picking approachable-looking people, which would bias your sample toward certain demographics.
- Aim for a minimum of 20 responses per site. 50+ is better for statistical significance.
- Note the time of day and day of week on every questionnaire — this helps you identify temporal bias when analysing results.
Ethical considerations (essential knowledge):
- Always introduce yourself and explain the purpose of the research before asking questions.
- Participants have the right to refuse — never pressure anyone to respond.
- Do not record names. Keep responses anonymous.
- Do not photograph respondents without explicit consent.
- Store data securely; use it only for the stated purpose.
Limitations:
- Social desirability bias: People may give the answer they think the researcher wants, or the answer that makes them look good, rather than their true view.
- Temporal bias: A weekday morning survey over-represents retired people and carers; a Saturday survey over-represents shoppers. Neither group is representative of all users of the space.
- Response rate: Many people refuse to stop. The sample of people willing to be questioned may not represent the wider population.
- Question wording: Leading questions ("Don't you think this area is unsafe?") influence responses. Questions must be neutral and unambiguous.
Quick Check: Give two ways you could improve the reliability of a pedestrian count investigation.
1. Conduct the count at all sites at the same time of day (e.g., all between 10am–11am) to control for time-of-day variation — pedestrian flow is higher at lunchtime than mid-morning in all zones, which would distort comparisons if sites were surveyed at different times. 2. Repeat the count three times at each site and calculate the mean — this reduces the effect of random variation (e.g., a delivery van blocking the pavement during one count period). Alternatively: survey on multiple days of the week and average results to capture both weekday and weekend patterns.
Worked method: choosing and justifying a fieldwork method
The selection logic examiners reward when asked 'why this method?'
- Match the method to the enquiry question firstAsk what you actually need to measure. Footfall or a CBD boundary needs pedestrian counts. Land use change or a CBD's function needs a land use survey. Opinions or reasons behind behaviour need a questionnaire. Choosing a method because it is easy, not because it answers the question, is the most common reason marks are lost.
- Know each method's weakness before choosingPedestrian counts vary hugely by time of day and weather, so a single count is unreliable. Land use classification can be subjective and can miss upper-floor use. Questionnaires are biased by who is willing to stop, and by leading wording.
- Match a mitigation to that specific weaknessPedestrian counts: repeat at the same locations at different times and average. Land use: use a fixed classification key agreed before fieldwork. Questionnaires: use closed questions with fixed response categories, and sample a spread of ages and times.
- State the reliability vs validity trade-offCounts and land use surveys give quick comparable data (higher reliability) but a single count is a snapshot. Questionnaires give richer data about reasons (higher validity for 'why') but are harder to compare precisely unless standardised.
- Combine methods to strengthen the conclusionThe strongest answers use two methods — pedestrian counts to show WHERE footfall is highest, a questionnaire to explain WHY people are there. Say this explicitly: one method measures the pattern, the other explains it.
A student investigated whether footfall changes with distance from the CBD. Justify the choice of pedestrian counts as the main method. (4 marks)
Pedestrian counts are appropriate because the enquiry is directly about the number of people at different locations, which is exactly what the method measures, giving quantitative data that can be compared numerically and plotted against distance from the CBD. It is quick to carry out at multiple sites in one day, allowing a large sample along a transect. It is not fully reliable alone because footfall varies by time of day and weather, so counts should be repeated at each site at the same times and on a day without unusual events, making results comparable between locations rather than a single snapshot.
Students often justify a method by saying it is 'easy' or 'quick' without linking it to what the enquiry needs to measure. Top marks come from stating the method measures exactly the variable in the question, then addressing its reliability limit.
Practice questions for Human Geography Fieldwork
What does EQS stand for in human geography fieldwork?
Describe how you would carry out an Environmental Quality Survey (EQS) along a transect from the city centre to the outer suburbs. Include how you would reduce subjectivity in your data.