Case Study C: Rewilding at Knepp Estate, West Sussex, UK (HIC)
Part of Sustaining Ecosystems — GCSE Geography
This deep dive covers Case Study C: Rewilding at Knepp Estate, West Sussex, UK (HIC) within Sustaining Ecosystems for GCSE Geography. Revise Sustaining Ecosystems in The Living World for GCSE Geography with 0 exam-style questions and 18 flashcards. This is a high-frequency topic, so it is worth revising until the explanation feels precise and repeatable. It is section 6 of 14 in this topic. Use this deep dive to connect the idea to the wider topic before moving on to questions and flashcards.
Topic position
Section 6 of 14
Practice
0 questions
Recall
18 flashcards
🦋 Case Study C: Rewilding at Knepp Estate, West Sussex, UK (HIC)
In 2001, Charlie Burrell and Isabella Tree made a decision that their neighbours thought was eccentric bordering on insane. They owned 3,500 acres of fertile farmland in the Weald of West Sussex — and they decided to stop farming it.
Not because the land was unproductive. Because intensive farming had made it biologically dead. Decades of ploughing, fertilisers, pesticides and tight grazing management had produced good yields of wheat and oilseed — but the hedgerows were empty, the ponds were silted, the soil was compacted, and the fields were silent. There were no turtle doves. No nightingales. No purple emperor butterflies. No stag beetles. The land produced food but nothing else.
What happened next became one of the most celebrated experiments in modern conservation — and a case study that examiners love because it is genuinely surprising.
The Rewilding Approach
Rewilding means removing intensive human management and allowing natural processes to reassert themselves. At Knepp, this meant:
The Results — Twenty Years Later
The Economics
Perhaps the most important lesson from Knepp for geographers: rewilding is not just ecologically successful — it is financially successful. The estate has developed a safari-style tourism business (glamping safaris, guided wildlife walks, educational visits) that generates approximately £2.5 million per year — significantly more than the intensive farming it replaced. The wildland beef and pork from the free-roaming herds sells at premium prices. The book written by Isabella Tree about the project became a bestseller. Wildlife documentaries have been filmed there. The land is now worth more wild than it was farmed.
Evaluation: Brilliant — But Scalable?
Quick Check: Compare the REDD+ scheme in the DRC with rewilding at Knepp. What does each approach achieve, and what is the main limitation of each?
REDD+ (DRC): Uses international payments (e.g. from Norway) to give developing countries a financial reason to protect forest instead of cutting it — addressing the core problem that standing forest has no market value. Limitation: payments often don't reach local communities, and without alternative livelihoods, people continue cutting trees illegally. Rewilding (Knepp): Removes intensive management and allows natural processes to restore biodiversity — turtle doves, nightingales, white storks all returned within 20 years. Generates £2.5m/year in tourism, more than farming. Limitation: requires a wealthy landowner willing to absorb transition costs; most farms are tenanted; not scalable everywhere without threatening food production. Both approaches demonstrate that conservation works best when it is economically viable for the people involved.