Test yourself on Tropical Rainforests with exam style questions, marked instantly.
Flashcards that come back just before you would forget them.
A revision plan that remembers what you know and shows what to do next.
See which topics you have nailed and which need another look.
Quiz yourself on Tropical RainforestsGet your flashcardsBuild my revision planTrack my progress📊 Amazon Deforestation: The Numbers Over Time
One of the most powerful stories in geography is hidden in this data: deforestation is not fixed — it responds directly to political decisions and enforcement. Brazil cut deforestation by 83% in eight years when it chose to act. Then it rose again when political will changed. This is your strongest argument for "management can work."
| Year / Period | Annual Deforestation (km²) | What Was Happening |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | ~29,000 km² | Peak of 1990s crisis — no effective monitoring |
| 2004 | 27,772 km² (peak) | Highest recorded rate; international pressure mounts |
| 2006 | ~14,000 km² | Soya Moratorium signed; INPE satellite monitoring begins |
| 2009 | ~7,500 km² | Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Deforestation (PPCDAm) takes effect |
| 2012 | 4,571 km² (lowest) | 83% reduction from 2004 peak — international success story |
| 2016 | ~8,000 km² | Weakening of Forest Code; enforcement budget cuts |
| 2019 | 11,088 km² | Bolsonaro government — reduced IBAMA (environmental agency) funding, anti-protection rhetoric |
| 2020 | ~11,100 km² | COVID-19 reduced enforcement presence; continued rise |
| 2023 | ~11,600 km² (first half) | Lula government; renewed enforcement; deforestation fell 50% by end of year |
Source: Brazil's National Institute for Space Research (INPE) PRODES monitoring system. Figures are for the Brazilian Amazon only.
Quick Check: What is the single largest cause of deforestation in the Amazon, and why does the 2004–2012 data matter for management questions?
Cattle ranching is the single largest cause, accounting for approximately 70% of cleared land in Brazil, driven by global demand for beef exports. The 2004–2012 data matters because it shows that deforestation is not inevitable — Brazil reduced annual forest loss from 27,772 km² in 2004 to 4,571 km² in 2012 (an 83% reduction) through satellite monitoring (INPE), stronger enforcement by IBAMA, and the Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Deforestation. This is the strongest evidence that management strategies can work. The subsequent rise under the Bolsonaro government (to over 11,000 km²) then shows that management only works when there is political will to enforce it.
Make this stick
Signing in gives access to all PrepWise features.