PrepWisePrepWiseManchuria Crisis
Conflict and Tension 1918-1939Source Analysis

Source Analysis Practice

Part of Manchuria Crisis — GCSE History

This source analysis covers Source Analysis Practice within Manchuria Crisis for GCSE History. Revise Manchuria Crisis in Conflict and Tension 1918-1939 for GCSE History with 8 exam-style questions and 5 flashcards. This topic appears regularly enough that it should still be part of a steady revision cycle. It is section 7 of 13 in this topic. Use this source analysis to connect the idea to the wider topic before moving on to questions and flashcards.

Topic position

Section 7 of 13

Practice

8 questions

Recall

5 flashcards

📜 Source Analysis Practice

"The members of the Commission are satisfied that, without declaration of war, a large part of Chinese territory has been forcibly seized and occupied by Japanese troops. The Chinese Government had no share in the creation of Manchukuo, which was the direct outcome of the military action of the Japanese Army."
— The Lytton Report, League of Nations Commission of Inquiry, October 1932

Applying NOP Analysis:

Nature: An official League of Nations Commission report — a formal document produced after a 14-month investigation involving site visits to Manchuria.

Origin: Produced by a five-nation commission led by British Lord Lytton, published October 1932 — over a year after Japan's invasion.

Purpose: To provide an impartial factual record for the League Assembly to act upon and to establish Japan's guilt as an aggressor beyond reasonable doubt.

Grade 9 Model Paragraph:

This source is useful for studying the Manchurian Crisis because it is the League's own official verdict — produced by an impartial multi-national commission after direct investigation. The clear finding that Manchukuo "was the direct outcome of the military action of the Japanese Army" confirms Japan acted as a deliberate aggressor. However, its utility is limited because the report's 14-month timeline — published over a year after the September 1931 invasion — itself illustrates the League's fatal slowness. By October 1932, Japan had already completed its conquest and installed Emperor Puyi as figurehead. The report condemned Japan, but Japan simply walked out of the League in March 1933 rather than comply, showing that accurate condemnation without enforcement was worthless as a deterrent.

Keep building this topic

Read this section alongside the surrounding pages in Manchuria Crisis. That gives you the full topic sequence instead of a single isolated revision point.

What Do Historians Think?Key Terms You Must KnowSetting the SceneTimeline of the Manchurian Crisis

Practice Questions for Manchuria Crisis

What was the Mukden Incident of September 1931?

  • A. Chinese troops attacked the Japanese garrison at Mukden, beginning the war
  • B. A staged explosion on the South Manchurian Railway used by Japan as a pretext to invade Manchuria
  • C. The League of Nations passed a resolution condemning Japan's aggression at Mukden
  • D. Japan formally declared war on China after clashes at the Mukden garrison
1 markfoundation

What was 'Manchukuo', created by Japan in 1932?

  • A. A Japanese province annexed directly into the Japanese Empire after the conquest of Manchuria
  • B. A League of Nations administered territory placed under international supervision after Japan's invasion
  • C. A puppet state in Manchuria with China's last emperor Pu Yi installed as a figurehead ruler
  • D. A Chinese nationalist government set up to resist Japanese occupation of Manchuria
1 markfoundation

Quick Recall Flashcards

What was Manchukuo?
Puppet state created by Japan in Manchuria with Pu Yi as figurehead
What was the Mukden Incident?
Sept 1931 — staged explosion on railway gave Japan excuse to invade Manchuria

Want to test your knowledge?

PrepWise has 8 exam-style questions and 5 flashcards for Manchuria Crisis — with adaptive difficulty and instant feedback.

Join Alpha

Previous

What Do Historians Think?

Next

Key Terms You Must Know