Test yourself on Food Resource Management with exam style questions, marked instantly.
Flashcards that come back just before you would forget them.
A revision plan that remembers what you know and shows what to do next.
See which topics you have nailed and which need another look.
Quiz yourself on Food Resource ManagementGet your flashcardsBuild my revision planTrack my progress💡 Exam Tips for Food Security and Management
🎯 What Examiners Are Looking For:
- Engagement with the four pillars — especially access and stability, not just availability
- Specific evidence: named case studies, statistics, dates (Green Revolution India trebled yields 1965–85; California subsidence 28 cm/yr; Ethiopia 12 million people depend on coffee)
- Awareness of trade-offs in every strategy — no food security approach has only benefits
- The nexus connection: linking food to water and energy when the question allows
- A clear judgement in evaluate questions — "Overall, the most effective strategy is... because..."
📝 Command Word Guide:
- Describe: State what the pattern/problem is. Use data. "Food insecurity is concentrated in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, where approximately 60% of the world's hungry live in conflict-affected countries."
- Explain: Say why, using a cause-chain. Connectives: "This means that...", "As a result...", "Because..."
- Assess/Evaluate: Weigh up evidence on both sides. Acknowledge trade-offs. End with a supported judgement: "Overall, I would argue that..."
- To what extent: Agree partially, disagree partially, justify your overall position with reference to evidence.
⚠️ Common Mistakes to Avoid:
- Writing only about production when the question asks about food security — always come back to access and the four pillars
- Treating the Green Revolution as entirely positive — always acknowledge the water depletion, inequality, and soil degradation trade-offs
- Vague phrases like "climate change affects farming" without specifying how: through heat stress, altered rainfall, more frequent droughts, or pest outbreaks
- Describing case studies without evaluating them — California and Ethiopia are only useful if you draw a judgement from comparing them
- Forgetting food waste — reducing the 30–40% of food that is currently wasted is a food security strategy that examiners expect you to know
Quick Check: "Large-scale commercial farming is the most effective way to improve global food security." Evaluate this statement. (Attempt a Level 3 answer in 5–8 sentences.)
Large-scale commercial farming, as demonstrated in California's Central Valley, is highly effective at increasing food availability — the valley produces 25% of US food from just 1% of farmland, feeding hundreds of millions of people at low cost per calorie. This addresses the availability pillar of food security at scale. However, this approach is undermined by serious long-term sustainability problems. The San Joaquin Valley is subsiding at up to 28 cm per year due to groundwater over-extraction, and if the aquifer is exhausted, the basis for production collapses. The 2012–17 California drought cut output by 40%, demonstrating that this system is climatically vulnerable. Furthermore, industrial food production does not automatically address the access pillar — food produced in California does not reach hungry communities in sub-Saharan Africa or conflict zones. In contrast, sustainable smallholder approaches like Ethiopian agroforestry, combined with Fairtrade certification, address all four pillars of food security for participating farmers while maintaining biodiversity. Overall, large-scale commercial farming is effective at generating large volumes of food but is not sufficient alone: it does not address distribution inequalities and is environmentally unsustainable in its current form. A combination of more sustainable production methods in both HICs and LICs, alongside reforms to trade systems and food waste reduction, offers a more complete long-term solution.
Make this stick
Signing in gives access to all PrepWise features.