Conflict and Tension 1918-1939Memory Aid

Memory Device — Which is Which?

Part of Abyssinia CrisisGCSE History

This memory aid covers Memory Device — Which is Which? within Abyssinia Crisis for GCSE History. Revise Abyssinia Crisis in Conflict and Tension 1918-1939 for GCSE History with 8 exam-style questions and 5 flashcards. This is a high-frequency topic, so it is worth revising until the explanation feels precise and repeatable. It is section 9 of 15 in this topic. Use it for quick recall, then test yourself straight afterwards so the memory aid becomes usable in an answer.

Topic position

Section 9 of 15

Practice

8 questions

Recall

5 flashcards

🧠 Memory Device — Which is Which?

The "M&A" trick:

  • Manchuria = Mukden trigger + March 1933 Japan leaves + Military clique in Japan
  • Abyssinia = Africa + Appeasement + Axis (Rome-Berlin, the consequence)

The dates: 1931 = Manchuria (M = 13th letter, 1+3=4, closer to 1931). 1935 = Abyssinia (A = 1st letter, comes after M just as Abyssinia came after Manchuria).

The "WAL-MUK" rule: Wal-Wal = Abyssinia. Mukden = Manchuria. Two very different-sounding incident names — learn both.

Exam Tip: Same Pattern, Different Evidence

Examiners love questions like: "Explain why the failure of the League in Manchuria encouraged further aggression" or "Write an account of how the Abyssinian Crisis showed the failure of collective security."

The pattern of failure is identical in both crises: aggressor creates pretext → invades → League investigates slowly → response is too weak → aggressor succeeds → dictators learn lesson → further aggression follows. But you must use the RIGHT specific evidence for the RIGHT crisis. Mixing up Mukden with Wal-Wal, or the Lytton Report with the Hoare-Laval Pact, will cost you marks at every level.

The Bigger Story — How They Connect

Together, Manchuria (1931) and Abyssinia (1935) proved beyond doubt that the League could not enforce collective security. This created a direct chain of consequences: Manchuria showed Mussolini that aggression worked, so he invaded Abyssinia. Abyssinia showed Hitler that Britain and France would not resist determined action, so he remilitarised the Rhineland (March 1936) — and then moved systematically through Austria, Czechoslovakia, and finally Poland. The road from Manchuria to September 1939 runs through Abyssinia. The steps to war are not independent events — they are a single chain, with each unpunished aggression making the next one more likely.

Keep building this topic

Read this section alongside the surrounding pages in Abyssinia Crisis. That gives you the full topic sequence instead of a single isolated revision point.

Practice Questions for Abyssinia Crisis

What was the Wal-Wal Incident of December 1934?

  • A. Italy formally declared war on Abyssinia at the oasis of Wal-Wal
  • B. A clash between Italian and Abyssinian troops at an oasis on the disputed border
  • C. The League of Nations voted to impose sanctions after a battle at Wal-Wal
  • D. Emperor Haile Selassie appealed to the League after troops mutinied at Wal-Wal
1 markfoundation

What did the Hoare-Laval Pact propose?

  • A. Immediate military intervention by Britain and France to defend Abyssinia
  • B. Total economic blockade of Italy including an oil embargo
  • C. A secret deal to give Italy approximately two-thirds of Abyssinia in exchange for peace
  • D. The expulsion of Italy from the League of Nations for its aggression
1 markfoundation

Quick Recall Flashcards

Why did sanctions fail?
No oil ban, Suez Canal stayed open, USA not in League
What was the Hoare-Laval Pact?
Secret deal to give Italy 2/3 of Abyssinia — leaked, both ministers resigned

Want to test your knowledge?

PrepWise has 8 exam-style questions and 5 flashcards for Abyssinia Crisis — with adaptive difficulty and instant feedback.

Join Alpha