Abyssinia Crisis

HistoryAQAGCSEUnit: Conflict and Tension 1918-1939
Free taster
5 of 6 sections open
The basics

Setting the Scene

📖 Setting the Scene

October 1935. Italian tanks, planes, and poison gas attack a country with spears and outdated rifles. Mussolini wants an African empire — revenge for Italy's humiliating defeat by Abyssinia at the Battle of Adwa in 1896. Emperor Haile Selassie makes an emotional appeal to the League of Nations: "It is us today. It will be you tomorrow." He was right. Britain and France were too scared of pushing Mussolini into Hitler's arms to stop him. The Hoare-Laval Pact secretly proposed giving Mussolini most of what he wanted. When it leaked, the scandal destroyed any remaining faith in the League. By May 1936, Abyssinia was conquered. The League was dead.

Italian Invasion of Ethiopia - History Matters (5 mins)

What was the Hoare-Laval Pact?: Secret deal to give Italy 2/3 of Abyssinia — leaked, both ministers resigned
Key terms

History glossary

What was the Hoare-Laval Pact?
Secret deal to give Italy 2/3 of Abyssinia — leaked, both ministers resigned
Spotlight
Timeline of the Abyssinian Crisis

This secret deal killed the League's credibility:

Exam tip

Earn the mark scheme marks

🧠 Memory Device — Which is Which?

The "M&A" trick:

  • Manchuria = Mukden trigger + March 1933 Japan leaves + Military clique in Japan
  • Abyssinia = Africa + Appeasement + Axis (Rome-Berlin, the consequence)

The dates: 1931 = Manchuria (M = 13th letter, 1+3=4, closer to 1931). 1935 = Abyssinia (A = 1st letter, comes after M just as Abyssinia came after Manchuria).

The "WAL-MUK" rule: Wal-Wal = Abyssinia. Mukden = Manchuria. Two very different-sounding incident names — learn both.

Exam Tip: Same Pattern, Different Evidence

Examiners love questions like: "Explain why the failure of the League in Manchuria encouraged further aggression" or "Write an account of how the Abyssinian Crisis showed the failure of collective security."

The pattern of failure is identical in both crises: aggressor creates pretext → invades → League investigates slowly → response is too weak → aggressor succeeds → dictators learn lesson → further aggression follows. But you must use the RIGHT specific evidence for the RIGHT crisis. Mixing up Mukden with Wal-Wal, or the Lytton Report with the Hoare-Laval Pact, will cost you marks at every level.

The Bigger Story — How They Connect

Together, Manchuria (1931) and Abyssinia (1935) proved beyond doubt that the League could not enforce collective security. This created a direct chain of consequences: Manchuria showed Mussolini that aggression worked, so he invaded Abyssinia. Abyssinia showed Hitler that Britain and France would not resist determined action, so he remilitarised the Rhineland (March 1936) — and then moved systematically through Austria, Czechoslovakia, and finally Poland. The road from Manchuria to September 1939 runs through Abyssinia. The steps to war are not independent events — they are a single chain, with each unpunished aggression making the next one more likely.

Now try it yourself

Quiz · Question 1 of 8

What was the Wal-Wal Incident of December 1934?

Tap an answer to check it

This topic in real past papers

Every real exam question we've found on abyssinia crisis, with a full worked answer.

← Previous topic

Manchuria Crisis

Next topic →

Hitler's Foreign Policy

Revise every History topic, free during alpha

Abyssinia Crisis is one of 61 topics on PrepWise — all aligned to your exam board.

Start revising free →