Three days left. Paper 2 splits into Medicine Through Time and Restoration England. One topic spans a thousand years, the other covers 25. Here's what actually gets tested and how to structure the answers that score.
One focus per day, building to a timed run. Work it in order.
Ranked from analysed past papers. Start at the top: if you run out of time, you will have covered the most-tested ground.
Appeared in every single one of the 5 sessions analysed, either as the source-utility question or the explain-similarity question. The single most reliable topic on the whole paper. Know medieval, 19th-century and 20th-century public health.
Appeared 4 times across 5 sessions, including as the 16-mark factor essay in June 2024. Always paired with Jenner or Koch in comparison questions, so learn all three individuals together.
Tested 4 times across 5 sessions, including as an 8-mark significance question and a 16-mark government-factor essay. Know the 1948 date, the principle of free healthcare, and its link to the Beveridge Report.
Appeared 3 times, most often paired against Koch or germ theory in the explain-similarity question. Learn 1796, cowpox, and why his method was scientific but he didn't understand WHY it worked.
Tested 3 times, usually as the strongest example of the 'chance' factor in the essay question. Know 1928, the mould contaminating Fleming's dish, and why mass production only happened during WW2.
Drove the 16-mark Historic Environment essay in 3 of the last 5 sessions (Tangier, coffee houses, Jamaica), the most predictable topic in the Restoration essay slot. Know the slave trade, key colonies, and the growth of coffee houses.
Appeared 3 times across 5 sessions, including twice in the same session (June 2023). Know why theatres reopened in 1660, what changed (actresses on stage for the first time), and Charles II's role.
Tested 3 times, including twice in the 8-mark interpretation-convincing slot. Know the September 1666 date, why it spread so fast (wooden houses, strong wind, narrow streets), and its consequences for rebuilding.
PrepWise has a one-page Knowledge Organiser for every topic above. In your final 3 days, use them the same way each time: cover the page, try to recall everything from memory, uncover and check what you missed, then repeat that topic again tomorrow.
Rules specific to Paper 2. On this paper, structure earns as many marks as knowledge.
'How useful is Source A to a historian studying X?' wants three things: what the source shows, who produced it and why (does that make it more or less reliable?), and how your OWN knowledge of the period supports or challenges what it claims. A pure content summary with no evaluation will not reach the top level.
Q2 asks you to explain why something mattered. Give the immediate effect AND the longer-term consequence. Q3 asks for similarities between two people or events from different periods. Give two developed similarities, each explained with evidence from both sides, rather than four shallow points.
Whichever factor is named in the question (science, war, government, chance, or the individual), explain it in depth with a strong example, then explain at least one other factor, then directly compare which mattered more in your conclusion. The 4 SPaG marks reward full sentences and paragraphs: never bullet points here.
'How convincing is Interpretation A about X?' wants you to test the interpretation's claim against what you actually know about the period. State what the interpretation argues, then use specific evidence to say whether that argument holds up. Don't just agree with it because it sounds reasonable.
Whatever site is named (a specific building, place or event), your answer must be built primarily around that site's own evidence, supported by your wider period knowledge, not the other way round. Answers that ignore the named site and just write everything they know about Restoration trade will lose marks for relevance.
The errors examiners see most on this paper. Each one is an easy mark you already know how to keep.
Describing a source instead of judging its utility → Retelling what a source says is not evaluation. Always follow content with a judgement: is this useful because of who wrote it, when, and what your own knowledge tells you about whether it's accurate?
Explaining only one factor in the 16+4 essay → The named factor alone will not get you into the top level. You must explain at least one other factor and directly weigh the two against each other in your conclusion: 'X was more important than Y because...'
Writing about the wrong period for the question → Medicine Through Time spans c.1250 to the present. Read the dates in the question carefully. 'Medieval' answers about the Renaissance, or 'modern' answers about the medieval period, score zero on relevance even if the facts are accurate.
Ignoring the named Historic Environment site → The 16-mark essay names a specific place or event for a reason. General Restoration knowledge with no reference to the named site caps your mark. Always start and end your paragraphs by returning to the site itself.
No specific evidence, just general statements → 'The Great Fire caused a lot of damage' is vague. 'The Great Fire of September 1666 destroyed over 13,000 houses and 87 churches, including old St Paul's Cathedral' is specific and scores higher. Attach a date, number, or named detail to every claim.
The 60 minutes before you walk in. Review what you know and settle your nerves.
Knowing the content is only half of it. Practise exam-style History questions in PrepWise, get marked instantly, and check your answers are built the way the mark scheme wants.
Open the History Knowledge Organisers, quiz every priority topic and walk in ready. Free during alpha.
Get started with your personalised revision