Conflict and Tension 1918-1939Source Analysis

Source Analysis Practice

Part of League SuccessesGCSE History

This source analysis covers Source Analysis Practice within League Successes for GCSE History. Revise League Successes in Conflict and Tension 1918-1939 for GCSE History with 8 exam-style questions and 5 flashcards. This topic shows up very often in GCSE exams, so students should be able to explain it clearly, not just recognise the term. It is section 8 of 14 in this topic. Use this source analysis to connect the idea to the wider topic before moving on to questions and flashcards.

Topic position

Section 8 of 14

Practice

8 questions

Recall

5 flashcards

📜 Source Analysis Practice

"The Commission of Inquiry finds that the Aaland Islands, by reason of their geographical situation, their predominantly Swedish-speaking population, and the expressed wishes of that population, should be placed under the sovereignty of Finland, subject to guarantees protecting the Swedish language and culture of the inhabitants."
— League of Nations Council Report on the Aaland Islands Question, June 1921

Applying NOP Analysis:

Nature: An official League of Nations Council report — a formal legal document setting out the Commission's binding ruling on a territorial dispute.

Origin: Produced by the League of Nations Commission of Inquiry in June 1921, at the request of both Sweden and Finland, who had agreed to submit the dispute to the League for arbitration.

Purpose: To provide a legally authoritative ruling that both governments could accept, ending the dispute without war. The report's tone is deliberately legalistic to signal impartiality.

Grade 9 Model Paragraph:

This source is useful for studying the League's work in the 1920s because it demonstrates the League successfully acting as an impartial arbitrator. The ruling references both geography and "the expressed wishes of that population" — reflecting Wilson's principle of self-determination — which made the decision difficult for Sweden to reject publicly. This makes the source useful for showing HOW the League's moral authority functioned: a ruling framed in terms of fairness carried more weight than a simple decree. However, its utility is limited because the source only shows a successful case. It cannot explain why the same method failed when major powers like Italy were involved — as the Corfu Incident (1923) would demonstrate just two years later.

Keep building this topic

Read this section alongside the surrounding pages in League Successes. That gives you the full topic sequence instead of a single isolated revision point.

Practice Questions for League Successes

In 1921, who did the League of Nations decide should control the Aaland Islands?

  • A. Sweden
  • B. Finland
  • C. Norway
  • D. Denmark
1 markfoundation

How did the League of Nations resolve the Upper Silesia dispute between Germany and Poland in 1921?

  • A. It awarded all of Upper Silesia to Poland
  • B. It awarded all of Upper Silesia to Germany
  • C. It held a plebiscite and divided the region between both countries
  • D. It imposed military occupation until both sides agreed
1 markfoundation

Quick Recall Flashcards

Bulgaria 1925?
Greece invaded, League made them withdraw and pay compensation.
Upper Silesia?
1921 — Germany vs Poland. Plebiscite then division. Both accepted.

Want to test your knowledge?

PrepWise has 8 exam-style questions and 5 flashcards for League Successes — with adaptive difficulty and instant feedback.

Join Alpha