Why These Worked — The Pattern to Notice

Part of League Successes · Section 4 of 14

Deep DiveUnit: Conflict and Tension 1918-1939GCSE

This deep dive covers Why These Worked — The Pattern to Notice within League Successes for GCSE History. Revise League Successes in Conflict and Tension 1918-1939 for GCSE History with 8 exam-style questions and 15 flashcards. This topic appears less often, but it can still be a useful differentiator on mixed-topic papers. It is section 4 of 14 in this topic. Use this deep dive to connect the idea to the wider topic before moving on to questions and flashcards.

🧠 Why These Worked — The Pattern to Notice

Small countries involved — Disputes involved Finland, Sweden, Bulgaria, Greece. None were major powers with the strength or prestige to defy the League.
No vital interests threatened — Major powers (Britain, France) didn't care enough about Aaland or Mosul to interfere with League decisions. When their own interests were involved, the pattern changed.
Genuine desire for peace in the 1920s — The 1920s were relatively stable internationally. Countries remembered the horrors of WW1 and genuinely wanted the League to succeed. The "spirit of Locarno" (1925) suggested international cooperation was possible.
BUT the Corfu Incident showed the limits (1923) — When major power Italy defied the League over the bombardment of Corfu, the League backed down. The Conference of Ambassadors overruled the League's own ruling and Greece had to apologise and pay Mussolini. It revealed that the League's authority was conditional on the powers involved being small enough to be overruled.
= A League that worked within narrow limits — The 1920s successes should not be dismissed. They showed the League had genuine value as a dispute-resolution mechanism when the countries involved accepted its authority. The problem was that determined major powers — Japan in 1931, Italy in 1935 — simply ignored it. The League's weaknesses were structural, not just unfortunate.

Practice questions for League Successes

In 1921, who did the League of Nations decide should control the Aaland Islands?

  • A. Sweden
  • B. Finland
  • C. Norway
  • D. Denmark
1 markfoundation

How did the League of Nations resolve the Upper Silesia dispute between Germany and Poland in 1921?

  • A. It awarded all of Upper Silesia to Poland
  • B. It awarded all of Upper Silesia to Germany
  • C. It held a plebiscite and divided the region between both countries
  • D. It imposed military occupation until both sides agreed
1 markfoundation

Quick recall flashcards

Bulgaria 1925?
Greece invaded, League made them withdraw and pay compensation.
Upper Silesia?
1921 — Germany vs Poland. Plebiscite then division. Both accepted.

8 questions on League Successes — practise free

Instant marking, adaptive difficulty and spaced-repetition flashcards — all aligned to your exam board.

Start revising free →