Test yourself on Coastal Processes and Landforms with exam style questions, marked instantly.
Flashcards that come back just before you would forget them.
A revision plan that remembers what you know and shows what to do next.
See which topics you have nailed and which need another look.
Quiz yourself on Coastal Processes and LandformsGet your flashcardsBuild my revision planTrack my progress๐ Case Study: The Holderness Coast, East Yorkshire
The Holderness Coast is the fastest-eroding coastline in Europe. It stretches for about 60 km from Flamborough Head in the north to Spurn Head in the south, and it is retreating at an average rate of 1.7 metres per year. In severe storms, sections have collapsed by up to 10 metres overnight. Since Roman times, more than 30 villages have disappeared beneath the North Sea โ the church towers of some of them are said to be visible on clear, calm days.
Why Is It Eroding So Fast? The Cause-Chain
The Human Cost: Who Is Being Affected?
- The village of Skipsea has lost numerous properties to coastal erosion; some homes have fallen directly onto the beach
- Mappleton was at serious risk by the early 1990s โ the B1242 coastal road was just metres from the cliff edge
- Withernsea and Hornsea are larger settlements further south that have historically faced erosion pressure
- Farmland is being lost at the rate of approximately 40 football pitches per year across the coastline
- Gas pipelines, sewage works, and electricity infrastructure within the coastal zone face eventual erosion
- The total economic cost of continued erosion, if unmanaged, is estimated in the tens of millions of pounds over coming decades
The Management Response โ and Its Consequences
In 1991, the government invested ยฃ2 million in protecting the village of Mappleton. Two rock groynes were built on the beach, and rock armour (large boulders of Norwegian granite) was placed at the cliff base. The protection worked: Mappleton's cliffs have remained essentially stable since 1991. The coastal road was saved.
But protecting Mappleton created a serious problem further south. The rock groynes trapped sediment on the north side of the village โ reducing the amount reaching beaches to the south. The cliffs immediately south of Mappleton now receive less sediment protection and face the full force of North Sea waves. Erosion rates south of Mappleton increased after the protection was built. The farm of Great Cowden, south of Mappleton, lost significant land in the years following the Mappleton scheme.
This is the central management dilemma of the Holderness coast โ and a critical exam point:
Quick Check: Explain why protecting Mappleton with rock armour increased erosion south of the village.
The rock groynes built at Mappleton trapped sediment on the beach to the north of the village, preventing it from being carried southward by longshore drift. This meant less sediment reached the beaches south of Mappleton. A beach acts as a natural buffer, absorbing wave energy before it reaches the cliff base. With less sediment supply and therefore a smaller beach, the cliffs south of Mappleton were exposed to the full force of North Sea waves. Erosion rates south of Mappleton increased after the protection scheme was built โ demonstrating that coastal management in one location can shift erosion problems rather than solve them, and that the sediment budget of the whole coast must be considered, not just individual sections.
Make this stick
Signing in gives access to all PrepWise features.