This deep dive covers Why Did Charles Win? within The Exclusion Crisis for GCSE History. Revise The Exclusion Crisis in Restoration England 1660-1685 for GCSE History with 10 exam-style questions and 15 flashcards. This topic appears regularly enough that it should still be part of a steady revision cycle. It is section 7 of 18 in this topic. Use this deep dive to connect the idea to the wider topic before moving on to questions and flashcards.
🔑 Why Did Charles Win?
French money: Secret agreement with Louis XIV gave Charles £385,000 between 1681-85 — enough to govern without Parliament. Once he could survive financially without Parliament, he could afford to dissolve it.
Public fear of civil war: Many people remembered the 1640s. Tories argued that excluding James meant rebellion and another civil war. Fear of chaos shifted moderate opinion back towards Charles.
Whig overreach: Some Whigs talked openly of armed resistance and suggested the Duke of Monmouth (Charles's illegitimate Protestant son) as alternative king. This made them look like rebels rather than constitutional reformers, and lost them moderate support.
Charles's tactical skill: He dissolved Parliaments at crucial moments — before the Lords could vote (1679), after the Commons passed the bill (1680), and after one week in Oxford (1681). He never gave a direct refusal — he always used procedural tactics.
Practice questions for The Exclusion Crisis
Why did Whig MPs attempt to pass the Exclusion Bills between 1679 and 1681?
What did Charles II do at the Oxford Parliament in March 1681?
Quick recall flashcards
Who led the Whigs?
Anthony Ashley Cooper, Earl of Shaftesbury — nicknamed 'Little Sincerity' by his enemies. Led the campaign to exclude James from the succession. After the Oxford Parliament's dissolution (1681) he fled to Holland, where he died in 1683.
What was the Exclusion Crisis?
1679-81: three successive Parliaments tried to pass Exclusion Bills to bar Catholic James, Duke of York, from succeeding to the throne. Charles dissolved all three Parliaments rather than allow the bills to pass. This was the most serious constitutional crisis of his reign.