Writing About Secondary Characters: Function, Not Feelings

Part of Lanyon and Utterson · Section 5 of 15

How It WorksUnit: The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr HydeGCSE

This how it works covers Writing About Secondary Characters: Function, Not Feelings within Lanyon and Utterson for GCSE English Literature. Revise Lanyon and Utterson in The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde for GCSE English Literature with 10 exam-style questions and 15 flashcards. This is a high-frequency topic, so it is worth revising until the explanation feels precise and repeatable. It is section 5 of 15 in this topic. Use this how it works to connect the idea to the wider topic before moving on to questions and flashcards.

⚙️ Writing About Secondary Characters: Function, Not Feelings

The most common error on Utterson and Lanyon is to write about them as though their feelings matter in themselves. They do not. Stevenson uses them to perform structural functions: Utterson is the narrative frame, Lanyon is the measure of the boundary Jekyll crosses. The analytical move is always to ask what Stevenson achieves by including this character, in this form, in this position in the narrative.

Technique 1 — Narrative positioning. Utterson is introduced first, before any other character. This is not accident: Stevenson gives the reader a deeply sympathetic version of Victorian respectability before showing what that respectability cannot see. The reader understands Utterson before being disappointed by him. The irony lands harder because the affection is genuine.

Technique 2 — Foil construction. Lanyon functions as a foil to Jekyll — not as a person but as an argument. His cheerful rationalism exists to be destroyed by the evidence Jekyll's experiment produces. Stevenson does not need Lanyon to be a complex character; he needs Lanyon to embody Victorian scientific confidence and then die of its failure. The death is a structural point, not a character tragedy.

Technique 3 — Epistolary framing. Both Lanyon's letter (Chapter 9) and Jekyll's Full Statement (Chapter 10) arrive as written documents. Stevenson uses the letter form to create layers of narrative distance: Lanyon writes to be read after his death, knowing the reader will already suspect the truth. The hesitation encoded in a deathbed letter — "I sometimes think if we knew all" — is Stevenson's way of giving the secondary character his most precise single moment without making him a major protagonist.

Practice questions for Lanyon and Utterson

Which of the following best describes Utterson's role in Jekyll and Hyde?

  • A. He is the villain who blackmails Jekyll and Hyde
  • B. He is Jekyll's lawyer and the primary viewpoint character who investigates the Hyde mystery
  • C. He is a scientist who experiments on Jekyll's behalf
  • D. He is a clergyman who tries to save Jekyll through prayer
1 markfoundation

Explain ONE technique Stevenson uses in constructing Utterson as the novella's narrator, and explain its effect.

2 marksstandard

Quick recall flashcards

What does "epistolary" mean? How does Stevenson use it in Jekyll and Hyde?
Epistolary means told through documents — letters, manuscripts, written accounts. Jekyll and Hyde uses the form in Chapters 9 and 10: Lanyon's letter (a posthumous witness account) and Jekyll's Full Statement (a posthumous confession). Both documents give the narrators a voice after death, and both arrive as physical objects Utterson must read. Stevenson uses the form to create narrative distance — the truths in these documents cannot be cross-examined. They arrive as final, uncontested, and unreachable.
I have had a shock, and I shall never recover.
<div class="fc-quotation-meta"><span>Lanyon (reported by Utterson)</span><span>Chapter 6</span><span>Rationalism · Gothic · Philosophical Collapse</span></div><p><strong>What it shows:</strong> Stevenson uses Lanyon's self-diagnosis to demonstrate that what the transformation destroys is not physical health but epistemological certainty. "A shock" — Lanyon cannot name what he has seen. The Victorian scientific vocabulary has no term for it. Stevenson presents the inarticulacy as the point: what cannot be classified cannot be survived.</p><div class="fc-quotation-significance"><strong>Significance</strong>Stevenson positions Lanyon's death as philosophical rather than physical. Victorian rationalism — confident, cheerful, certain of its categories — cannot accommodate the Gothic truth and so ceases. Lanyon is Stevenson's proof that the era's dominant intellectual framework is insufficient.</div><div class="fc-quotation-deployment"><strong>Use in essays on</strong>Lanyon's death and its meaning; Victorian science and its limits; how Stevenson uses secondary characters to make structural arguments; Gothic genre and the limits of rationalism.</div>

10 questions on Lanyon and Utterson — practise free

Instant marking, adaptive difficulty and spaced-repetition flashcards — all aligned to your exam board.

Start revising free →