Arctic Governance — Why It Is Much Weaker
Part of Cold Environments — Threats & Management · GCSE GCSE Geography revision
This deep dive covers Arctic Governance — Why It Is Much Weaker within Cold Environments — Threats & Management for GCSE Geography. Revise Cold Environments — Threats & Management in Cold Environments for GCSE Geography with 15 exam-style questions and 20 flashcards. This topic appears regularly enough that it should still be part of a steady revision cycle. It is section 8 of 16 in this topic. Use this deep dive to connect the idea to the wider topic before moving on to questions and flashcards.
Topic position
Section 8 of 16
Practice
15 questions
Recall
20 flashcards
🌨️ Arctic Governance — Why It Is Much Weaker
The Arctic is fundamentally different from Antarctica as a governance challenge. Antarctica has no sovereign territory and no permanent human population — it could be governed as a global commons. The Arctic is surrounded by eight sovereign nations, contains indigenous peoples' lands, has been commercially exploited for centuries, and is at the centre of competing geopolitical interests worth trillions of dollars.
The Arctic Council
The main body for Arctic governance is the Arctic Council, established in 1996 by the Ottawa Declaration. Its structure:
The Svalbard Treaty 1920
The Norwegian archipelago of Svalbard (Spitsbergen) is governed under a unique 1920 treaty with 46 signatories (including Russia and the UK). Norway has full sovereignty, but other signatories have the right to conduct commercial activities — including mining. Russia still operates a coal mine (Barentsburg) under this treaty, even though the mine runs at a loss; its value is strategic and political.
UNCLOS and the Outer Continental Shelf
Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS, 1982), coastal states can claim an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) extending 200 nautical miles offshore, within which they have exclusive rights to resources. They can also claim an "outer continental shelf" extending beyond 200 nautical miles if they can prove the seabed is a natural extension of their land mass. Russia, Canada, and Denmark (on behalf of Greenland) have all submitted — or are preparing — competing claims to the same area of the Arctic seabed, including the Lomonosov Ridge, which passes close to the North Pole.