Cold EnvironmentsDeep Dive

Arctic Governance — Why It Is Much Weaker

Part of Cold Environments — Threats & Management · GCSE GCSE Geography revision

This deep dive covers Arctic Governance — Why It Is Much Weaker within Cold Environments — Threats & Management for GCSE Geography. Revise Cold Environments — Threats & Management in Cold Environments for GCSE Geography with 15 exam-style questions and 20 flashcards. This topic appears regularly enough that it should still be part of a steady revision cycle. It is section 8 of 16 in this topic. Use this deep dive to connect the idea to the wider topic before moving on to questions and flashcards.

Topic position

Section 8 of 16

Practice

15 questions

Recall

20 flashcards

🌨️ Arctic Governance — Why It Is Much Weaker

The Arctic is fundamentally different from Antarctica as a governance challenge. Antarctica has no sovereign territory and no permanent human population — it could be governed as a global commons. The Arctic is surrounded by eight sovereign nations, contains indigenous peoples' lands, has been commercially exploited for centuries, and is at the centre of competing geopolitical interests worth trillions of dollars.

The Arctic Council

The main body for Arctic governance is the Arctic Council, established in 1996 by the Ottawa Declaration. Its structure:

  • 8 member states: USA, Canada, Russia, Norway, Denmark (representing Greenland and the Faroe Islands), Iceland, Sweden, Finland
  • 6 Permanent Participant organisations representing Arctic indigenous peoples: Inuit Circumpolar Council, Saami Council, and others
  • Observer states (non-voting): China, UK, Germany, France, Japan, South Korea, India and others — showing the global interest in Arctic access
  • Critical limitation: The Arctic Council is NOT legally binding; it produces recommendations and guidelines but cannot impose rules on member states
  • Critical limitation: Climate change — the primary threat — is explicitly not within the council's mandate; it focuses on sustainable development and environmental protection in the narrower sense
  • The Kiruna Declaration (2013) was the first time the Arctic Council explicitly acknowledged climate change as a major Arctic challenge, but produced no binding commitments
  • The Svalbard Treaty 1920

    The Norwegian archipelago of Svalbard (Spitsbergen) is governed under a unique 1920 treaty with 46 signatories (including Russia and the UK). Norway has full sovereignty, but other signatories have the right to conduct commercial activities — including mining. Russia still operates a coal mine (Barentsburg) under this treaty, even though the mine runs at a loss; its value is strategic and political.

    UNCLOS and the Outer Continental Shelf

    Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS, 1982), coastal states can claim an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) extending 200 nautical miles offshore, within which they have exclusive rights to resources. They can also claim an "outer continental shelf" extending beyond 200 nautical miles if they can prove the seabed is a natural extension of their land mass. Russia, Canada, and Denmark (on behalf of Greenland) have all submitted — or are preparing — competing claims to the same area of the Arctic seabed, including the Lomonosov Ridge, which passes close to the North Pole.

    Why Arctic Governance Is Weaker Than Antarctic

  • Competing sovereign interests — the 8 Arctic nations have economic and strategic interests that conflict: Russia has militarised the Arctic (new bases, nuclear-capable submarines), while the USA and Canada dispute each other's claims to the Northwest Passage
  • Post-2022 tensions — Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 effectively suspended normal Arctic Council operations; the other 7 members boycotted meetings chaired by Russia; the council has been largely paralysed since
  • China's growing interest — China declared itself a "near-Arctic state" in 2018 and has invested heavily in Russian Arctic LNG projects; it has observer status at the Arctic Council but seeks greater influence
  • No Antarctic-equivalent treaty — there is no legal instrument that freezes territorial claims or bans military activity in the Arctic; the 1982 UNCLOS provides a framework but was designed for temperate oceans, not rapidly changing Arctic conditions
  • Indigenous rights — Arctic governance must engage with indigenous peoples (Inuit, Saami, Nenets) whose lands and food systems are threatened; the Antarctic Treaty had no such obligation because there is no indigenous population
  • Keep building this topic

    Read this section alongside the surrounding pages in Cold Environments — Threats & Management. That gives you the full topic sequence instead of a single isolated revision point.

    Practice Questions for Cold Environments — Threats & Management

    What term describes the process where the Arctic is warming approximately twice as fast as the global average?

    • A. Thermal expansion
    • B. Polar amplification
    • C. The greenhouse effect
    • D. Ice albedo feedback
    1 markfoundation

    Explain why the melting of Arctic sea ice leads to further warming. [2 marks]

    2 marksstandard

    Quick Recall Flashcards

    How much has Antarctic tourism grown?
    From fewer than 5,000 visitors in 1990 to approximately 74,400 in 2019–20 — mostly on cruise ships. This rapid growth threatens fragile ecosystems.
    What is the ANWR debate in Alaska?
    The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge contains an estimated 7.7 billion barrels of recoverable oil. The debate is whether to drill (economic benefit, energy security) or protect the sensitive ecosystem (caribou, polar bears).

    15 questions on Cold Environments — Threats & Management — practise free

    Instant marking, adaptive difficulty, and 20 spaced repetition flashcards. Free until your GCSEs.

    Try PrepWise Free