Exam Connection — OCR B J384
Part of Cold Environments — Threats & Management · GCSE GCSE Geography revision
This exam focus covers Exam Connection — OCR B J384 within Cold Environments — Threats & Management for GCSE Geography. Revise Cold Environments — Threats & Management in Cold Environments for GCSE Geography with 15 exam-style questions and 20 flashcards. This topic appears regularly enough that it should still be part of a steady revision cycle. It is section 14 of 16 in this topic. Treat this as a marking guide for what examiners are looking for, not just a fact list.
Topic position
Section 14 of 16
Practice
15 questions
Recall
20 flashcards
🎯 Exam Connection — OCR B J384
Paper: Paper 1 — Our Natural World (Topic 1.4: Polar Environments)
Exam frequency: High — polar threats and management appear in almost every OCR B sitting, with particular emphasis on evaluating management strategies and understanding climate change feedback mechanisms.
Typical OCR B Question Types for This Topic:
- "Outline one threat to a polar environment you have studied." [2 marks] — Name the environment (Arctic or Antarctic) and the specific threat; include at least one statistic. Example: "Climate change has caused Arctic sea ice to decline by approximately 13% per decade since 1979, with a record minimum of 3.41 million km² in 2012 — roughly half the average from the 1980s."
- "Explain how climate change creates a positive feedback loop in the Arctic." [4 marks] — You need to describe the cycle: warming → ice melts → albedo decreases → more solar radiation absorbed → more warming → more ice melts. Use the terms "albedo" and "positive feedback" explicitly.
- "Explain why permafrost thaw is a significant threat to the climate." [4 marks] — Link permafrost thaw to methane release (CH₄), state that methane is 28× more powerful than CO₂ over 100 years, and explain the positive feedback mechanism.
- "Evaluate the management of threats to polar environments." [8 marks] — This is the top-end question. You need: named management strategies with specific evidence (Antarctic Treaty 1959, Madrid Protocol 1991, Ross Sea MPA 2016); strengths (65 years, no oil drilling in Antarctica); weaknesses (voluntary compliance only, climate change not addressed, Arctic Council non-binding, Russia paralysed it after 2022); a supported overall judgement.
Level 1 → Level 2 → Level 3 Progression for the 8-Mark Evaluate Question:
"Evaluate the management of threats to polar environments." (8 marks)
Level 1 answer (1–3 marks): "Antarctica has a treaty that protects it. Tourism is managed and so is fishing. The Arctic Council manages the Arctic. Climate change is a big threat that is hard to manage."
— This identifies some management strategies and threats but offers no explanation, no named evidence, and no evaluation of effectiveness.
Level 2 answer (4–6 marks): "The Antarctic Treaty (1959) has been effective at preventing military activity and territorial disputes between the 54 signatory nations. The Madrid Protocol (1991) bans mineral extraction in Antarctica until at least 2048, providing long-term protection. CCAMLR manages fishing in the Southern Ocean using an ecosystem approach, and the Ross Sea MPA (2016) at 1.55 million km² restricts fishing across 72% of the world's most pristine marine ecosystem. However, the Arctic lacks equivalent protection — the Arctic Council is non-binding and Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 has effectively paralysed it."
— This names specific evidence, compares Antarctic and Arctic governance, and begins to evaluate, but does not fully explore the systemic limitations or reach a supported judgement.
Level 3 answer (7–8 marks): "The Antarctic Treaty System (ATS) has been largely effective because it was negotiated before Antarctic resource extraction was technically or economically feasible — meaning no nation was asked to sacrifice actual economic interest. The Madrid Protocol's 2048 mineral extraction ban demonstrates this: it was agreed in 1991, when the technology to drill in Antarctica did not yet exist commercially. This preventative approach has ensured that Antarctica remains the only continent with no active mineral extraction after 65 years. However, the Antarctic Treaty System has a fundamental flaw: it does not address climate change — the primary long-term threat — because that requires global action far beyond polar governance. The Arctic's situation is worse: the Arctic Council (1996) is entirely non-binding, and Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine effectively suspended its operations. National interests dominate Arctic governance: Russia militarises the region and opposes the proposed East Antarctic MPA under CCAMLR; China and Russia have blocked it since 2012. The Ross Sea MPA (2016) shows that progress is possible — but only after 5 years of negotiation, with compromises (limited fishing in research zones), and for only 35 years. On balance, Antarctic management is moderately effective for what the treaty covers, but neither the Antarctic Treaty System nor the Arctic Council can address the primary driver of polar change — climate change — and this is the central failure of polar governance globally."
— This provides specific named evidence, a structured evaluation comparing both regions, engagement with systemic limitations, and a clear supported judgement.
OCR B Command Words for This Topic:
- Outline / State: Brief factual point with a statistic — "Arctic sea ice has declined by 13% per decade since 1979"
- Explain: Cause and mechanism with "because" — "because the albedo of dark ocean water (~0.06) is far lower than sea ice (~0.9), more solar radiation is absorbed, accelerating warming"
- Evaluate: Weigh evidence on both sides; reach a supported conclusion — "On balance... because..."
- Assess: Make a judgement about the importance or effectiveness of something, with supporting evidence