Cold EnvironmentsDeep Dive

The Antarctic Treaty System — How Antarctica Is Governed

Part of Cold Environments — Threats & Management · GCSE GCSE Geography revision

This deep dive covers The Antarctic Treaty System — How Antarctica Is Governed within Cold Environments — Threats & Management for GCSE Geography. Revise Cold Environments — Threats & Management in Cold Environments for GCSE Geography with 15 exam-style questions and 20 flashcards. This topic appears regularly enough that it should still be part of a steady revision cycle. It is section 7 of 16 in this topic. Use this deep dive to connect the idea to the wider topic before moving on to questions and flashcards.

Topic position

Section 7 of 16

Practice

15 questions

Recall

20 flashcards

📜 The Antarctic Treaty System — How Antarctica Is Governed

Antarctica has no indigenous human population, no sovereign government, and overlapping territorial claims from seven nations (Argentina, Australia, Chile, France, New Zealand, Norway, the UK). Yet it is arguably the best-governed wilderness on Earth. The reason is a remarkable piece of Cold War diplomacy: the Antarctic Treaty.

The Antarctic Treaty 1959

Signed in Washington DC on 1 December 1959 by 12 nations (including the USA and USSR at the height of the Cold War), the Antarctic Treaty now has 54 signatories. Its key provisions:

  • Article I — Antarctica shall be used for peaceful purposes only; all military activity is banned
  • Article II — Freedom of scientific investigation in Antarctica is guaranteed for all signatories
  • Article IV — Territorial claims are frozen: existing claims are neither recognised nor renounced; no new claims can be made while the treaty is in force
  • Article V — Nuclear explosions and disposal of radioactive waste are banned in Antarctica
  • Currently 29 Consultative Parties (nations with full voting rights, based on having active research programmes) and 25 non-consultative parties
  • Protocol on Environmental Protection 1991 (Madrid Protocol)

    The Madrid Protocol was the treaty system's most significant development. It designates Antarctica as a "natural reserve devoted to peace and science" and imposes:

  • A ban on all mineral resource activity (mining and oil drilling) in Antarctica — until at least 2048, when the protocol can first be reviewed for modification
  • Comprehensive environmental impact assessment requirements for all activities in Antarctica
  • Strict waste management and pollution prevention rules
  • Protection of Antarctic flora and fauna
  • A Committee for Environmental Protection (CEP) to monitor compliance
  • CCAMLR — Managing Antarctic Fishing

    The Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR, 1982) manages fishing in the Southern Ocean. It uses an "ecosystem approach" — setting quotas for krill and Patagonian toothfish based on what the whole ecosystem, including whales and penguins, needs, not just what is commercially sustainable.

  • 25 member nations set annual fishing quotas for the Southern Ocean
  • The Ross Sea Marine Protected Area (2016) — the world's largest MPA at 1.55 million km² — was agreed under CCAMLR; it restricts fishing in 72% of the area for a 35-year term
  • Challenge: illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing remains a significant problem; Patagonian toothfish ("Chilean sea bass") are targeted by illegal vessels beyond CCAMLR's reach
  • Evaluation: How Effective Is the Antarctic Treaty System?

  • Success — No military activity in Antarctica since 1959; no nuclear testing; no mineral extraction; territorial disputes frozen peacefully for 65 years
  • Success — The Madrid Protocol's 2048 mineral extraction ban was agreed before Antarctic resource extraction was technically or economically feasible — a rare example of preventative environmental governance
  • Weakness — Enforcement relies entirely on voluntary compliance; there is no Antarctic police force or independent enforcement body
  • Weakness — The treaty does not address climate change — the primary long-term threat to Antarctica — because it requires global rather than polar governance
  • Weakness — The 2048 review clause creates uncertainty; if mineral extraction becomes economically attractive by then, the ban may not be renewed
  • Weakness — Tourism is poorly regulated; the treaty does not set binding limits on visitor numbers or cruise ship operations
  • Keep building this topic

    Read this section alongside the surrounding pages in Cold Environments — Threats & Management. That gives you the full topic sequence instead of a single isolated revision point.

    Practice Questions for Cold Environments — Threats & Management

    What term describes the process where the Arctic is warming approximately twice as fast as the global average?

    • A. Thermal expansion
    • B. Polar amplification
    • C. The greenhouse effect
    • D. Ice albedo feedback
    1 markfoundation

    Explain why the melting of Arctic sea ice leads to further warming. [2 marks]

    2 marksstandard

    Quick Recall Flashcards

    What is the ANWR debate in Alaska?
    The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge contains an estimated 7.7 billion barrels of recoverable oil. The debate is whether to drill (economic benefit, energy security) or protect the sensitive ecosystem (caribou, polar bears).
    How much has Antarctic tourism grown?
    From fewer than 5,000 visitors in 1990 to approximately 74,400 in 2019–20 — mostly on cruise ships. This rapid growth threatens fragile ecosystems.

    15 questions on Cold Environments — Threats & Management — practise free

    Instant marking, adaptive difficulty, and 20 spaced repetition flashcards. Free until your GCSEs.

    Try PrepWise Free